M. S. Walker, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

M. S. Walker, Inc. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 377, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2415

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 3, 1967

DocketC.D. 2991

StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 377 (M. S. Walker, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M. S. Walker, Inc. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 377, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2415 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Richardson, Judge:

This protest is before the court on a motion made by the Government for a dismissal of the protest on the ground that it is untimely. No answering or opposing papers were submitted on the motion by or on behalf of the plaintiff.

The official papers before the court disclose that the subject entry was liquidated on December 15, 1960, and that the protest was filed on February 23, 1961, or 70 days after liquidation. In view of the statutory limitation of 60 days within which a protest must be filed following liquidation (19 U.S.C.A., section 1514), the court is without jurisdiction to entertain the instant protest, and the motion to dismiss for untimeliness must be granted.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson, Judge:

This protest is before the court on a motion made by the Government for a dismissal of the protest on the ground that it is untimely. No answering or opposing papers were submitted on the motion by or on behalf of the plaintiff.

The official papers before the court disclose that the subject entry was liquidated on December 15, 1960, and that the protest was filed on February 23, 1961, or 70 days after liquidation. In view of the statutory limitation of 60 days within which a protest must be filed following liquidation (19 U.S.C.A., section 1514), the court is without jurisdiction to entertain the instant protest, and the motion to dismiss for untimeliness must be granted.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 Cust. Ct. 377, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-s-walker-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1967.