M. S. & J. A. Workman, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

M. S. & J. A. Workman, Inc. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 333

United States Customs Court·Decided December 8, 1955·No. No. 59526; protest 737292-G (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry [334]*334under paragraph 1681 was sustained. Entry 726857, having been abandoned, the protest was overruled as to said entry.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry [334]*334under paragraph 1681 was sustained. Entry 726857, having been abandoned, the protest was overruled as to said entry.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

M. S. & J. A. Workman, Inc. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 333 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

35 Cust. Ct. 333 (M. S. & J. A. Workman, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related