M. & S. Electric Co. v. Moskowitz

152 Misc. 412, 272 N.Y.S. 518, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1389
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedJune 11, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 152 Misc. 412 (M. & S. Electric Co. v. Moskowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
M. & S. Electric Co. v. Moskowitz, 152 Misc. 412, 272 N.Y.S. 518, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1389 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1934).

Opinion

Winter, J.

Section 170 of the Municipal Court Code provides that “ A party to whom costs are awarded shall be allowed his necessary disbursements as follows: * * * 6. Such other reasonable and necessary expenses as are prescribed by law or taxable by express provision of law.”

Section 177 provides that where the transcript of the stenographer’s minutes becomes a necessary part of the return on appeal, they should be paid in the first instance by the appellant and be taxable by him as a disbursement on the appeal.

The authority to tax stenographer’s minutes is plainly limited to A party to whom costs are awarded.” This defendant, however, [413]*413was not absolutely awarded costs on the appeal, but his costs were conditioned to abide the event of a new trial. Should the plaintiff again succeed on the new trial, this defendant would not be entitled to the costs or disbursements of his successful appeal, but these would be awarded to the successful party on the new trial. (Greenwald v. Weir, 131 App. Div. 568.)

Accordingly, the taxation by the clerk of the disbursements on appeal was erroneous.

Under section 171 of the Municipal Court Code, however, this court’s power to review this erroneous taxation was limited to a time expiring ten days after taxation. (Rosebrock Butter & Egg Co. v. Jorisch, 157 N. Y. Supp. 234.)

This motion for reargument is granted and the order of May 2, 1934, of this court is vacated, and the plaintiff’s motion to vacate the judgment entered herein is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greenwald v. Weir
131 A.D. 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Rosebrock Butter & Egg Co. v. Jorisch
157 N.Y.S. 234 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 Misc. 412, 272 N.Y.S. 518, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-s-electric-co-v-moskowitz-nynyccityct-1934.