M. Perez Co. v. Apfel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

M. Perez Co. v. Apfel

110 A.D. 866, 95 N.Y.S. 1148

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 110 A.D. 866 (M. Perez Co. v. Apfel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M. Perez Co. v. Apfel, 110 A.D. 866, 95 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam;

. Upon condition that the defendant give an undertaking with two sureties to pay any judgment that the plaintiff may recover against him, the order appealed from denying a motion for the appointment of a receiver and for an injunction should be affirmed, without costs. If he-should refuse or neglect within ten days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon to give ' ' such undertaking the order, appealed, from will be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present—‘ ' O’Brien, P. J., Patterson, Ingraham, Laughlin .and Clarke, JJ.' Order affirmed, without costs, on defendant complying with conditions stated in opinion; other- ■ wise, order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and (motion granted, with ten dollars costs. " . ■''

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam;

. Upon condition that the defendant give an undertaking with two sureties to pay any judgment that the plaintiff may recover against him, the order appealed from denying a motion for the appointment of a receiver and for an injunction should be affirmed, without costs. If he-should refuse or neglect within ten days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon to give ' ' such undertaking the order, appealed, from will be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present—‘ ' O’Brien, P. J., Patterson, Ingraham, Laughlin .and Clarke, JJ.' Order affirmed, without costs, on defendant complying with conditions stated in opinion; other- ■ wise, order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and (motion granted, with ten dollars costs. " . ■''

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 A.D. 866, 95 N.Y.S. 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-perez-co-v-apfel-nyappdiv-1905.