M & P Enterprises, Inc. v. Summer Set Property Owners Ass'n

Missouri Court of Appeals

M & P Enterprises, Inc. v. Summer Set Property Owners Ass'n

204 S.W.3d 698, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1651, 2006 WL 3071359

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 31, 2006·No. No. ED 87867·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

M & P Enterprises, Inc. (“M & P”) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Summer Set Property Owners Association, also known as Summer Set Property Owners Association, Inc. (“Association”) and awarding past-due subdivision assessments in the amount of $2,195.40, and attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,507.50.

Initially, we note that there was a jurisdictional issue taken with the case and having considered the issue, we find we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Furthermore, we have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and [699] find the claims of error to be without merit. There are no genuine issues of material fact and Association was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Commerical Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

M & P Enterprises, Inc. (“M & P”) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Summer Set Property Owners Association, also known as Summer Set Property Owners Association, Inc. (“Association”) and awarding past-due subdivision assessments in the amount of $2,195.40, and attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,507.50.

Initially, we note that there was a jurisdictional issue taken with the case and having considered the issue, we find we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Furthermore, we have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and [699] find the claims of error to be without merit. There are no genuine issues of material fact and Association was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Commerical Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

M & P Enterprises, Inc. v. Summer Set Property Owners Ass'n, 204 S.W.3d 698, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1651, 2006 WL 3071359 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

204 S.W.3d 698 (M & P Enterprises, Inc. v. Summer Set Property Owners Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related