M. O. v. A. U., C. T.
This text of M. O. v. A. U., C. T. (M. O. v. A. U., C. T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
In the Interest of E.T., J.T., C.T., A.U., S.U., and H.U., children.
M.O.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM,
Appellees.
No. 2D2023-2549
April 17, 2024
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Daryl M. Manning, Judge.
Jonathan E. Hackworth of Hackworth Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
Mary Soorus of Children's Legal Services, Tampa, for Appellee Department of Children and Families.
Jennifer E. Jones of McIntyre Thanasides Bringgold Elliott Grimaldi Guito & Matthews, P.A., Defending Best Interests Project, Tampa; and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd Weitz, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
M. O. v. A. U., C. T., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-o-v-a-u-c-t-fladistctapp-2024.