M & M Supermarket v. Diaz

43 So. 3d 931, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13562, 2010 WL 3584474
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 13, 2010
DocketNo. 1D10-3340
StatusPublished

This text of 43 So. 3d 931 (M & M Supermarket v. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
M & M Supermarket v. Diaz, 43 So. 3d 931, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13562, 2010 WL 3584474 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s timely response to this Court’s show cause order, the Court hereby DISMISSES this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C). See also, e.g., Sun Sentinel & Tribune Co. v. Petrovich, 744 So.2d 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Cadco Builders, Inc. v. Roberts, 712 So.2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

DISMISSED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sun Sentinel v. Petrovich
744 So. 2d 1056 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Cadco Builders, Inc. v. Roberts
712 So. 2d 457 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 So. 3d 931, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13562, 2010 WL 3584474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-m-supermarket-v-diaz-fladistctapp-2010.