M. L. Walker v. H. C. Glenn

82 S.W.2d 768, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 506
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 3, 1935·No. No. 8044.·Published

Opinion

McCLENDON, Chief Justice.

Appeal from a judgment for appellee upon certain promissory notes and foreclosing first and second trust deed liens securing them..

Appellants urge two grounds of reversal:

1. The overruling of a motion for continuance predicated upon the moratorium statute. Since the trial of this case the Supreme Court has held this statute unconstitutional ; hence this ruling of the trial court presents no error. Travelers’ Ins. Co. v. Marshall (Tex. Sup.) 76 S.W.(2d) 1007, 96 A. L. R. 802.
"2: The refusal of the trial court to sustain a' plea of usury predicated upon the provisions of the trust deeds. The case is ruled in this regard by the decision in Walker v. Temple Trust Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 60 S.W.(2d) 826, recently affirmed by the Supreme Court, 80 S.W.(2d) 935.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M. L. Walker v. H. C. Glenn, 82 S.W.2d 768, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 506 (Tex. Ct. App. 1935).

82 S.W.2d 768 (M. L. Walker v. H. C. Glenn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Temple Trust Co.
80 S.W.2d 935 (Texas Supreme Court, 1935)
Travelers Insurance v. Marshall
76 S.W.2d 1007 (Texas Supreme Court, 1934)
Walker v. Temple Trust Co.
60 S.W.2d 826 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)