M & K CHEMICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

M & K CHEMICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.

295 S.W.3d 492, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 987, 2009 WL 1758951

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 23, 2009·No. ED 92278·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

M & K Chemical Engineering Consultants, Inc. (“M & K”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Mallinckrodt, Inc. and Tyco Healthcare Retail Group, Inc. (collectively, “Mallinckrodt”) and dismissing M & K’s petition for failure to state a claim.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

M & K Chemical Engineering Consultants, Inc. (“M & K”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Mallinckrodt, Inc. and Tyco Healthcare Retail Group, Inc. (collectively, “Mallinckrodt”) and dismissing M & K’s petition for failure to state a claim.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

M & K CHEMICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. v. Mallinckrodt, Inc., 295 S.W.3d 492, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 987, 2009 WL 1758951 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

295 S.W.3d 492 (M & K CHEMICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.