M. J. Uline Co. v. Schnittker

D.C. Circuit

M. J. Uline Co. v. Schnittker

218 F.2d 373

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 13, 1955

DocketNos. 12193, 12194

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 218 F.2d 373 (M. J. Uline Co. v. Schnittker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M. J. Uline Co. v. Schnittker, 218 F.2d 373 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit by a former employee against his employer for damages for breach of the employment contract. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff. The employer appeals (No. 12,193), chiefly on the ground that under its construction of the contract it was not subject to liability. The plaintiff also appeals (No. 12,194), on the ground that damages were fixed at too low an amount. After reviewing the record, we find no error affecting the rights of either party. The judgment of the District Court will accordingly be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit by a former employee against his employer for damages for breach of the employment contract. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff. The employer appeals (No. 12,193), chiefly on the ground that under its construction of the contract it was not subject to liability. The plaintiff also appeals (No. 12,194), on the ground that damages were fixed at too low an amount. After reviewing the record, we find no error affecting the rights of either party. The judgment of the District Court will accordingly be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 F.2d 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-j-uline-co-v-schnittker-cadc-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack