M. J. Moore v. Clyde Eckols

Court of Appeals of Texas

M. J. Moore v. Clyde Eckols

149 S.W.2d 1014, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 218

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 2, 1941

DocketNo. 10934.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 149 S.W.2d 1014 (M. J. Moore v. Clyde Eckols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M. J. Moore v. Clyde Eckols, 149 S.W.2d 1014, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 218 (Tex. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The case is one of fact which the trial judge resolved against appellant, upon-what is deemed sufficient evidence. No good purpose can be served by filing a written opinion, and under the now settled rule none will be filed. Page v. Hart, Tex.Civ.App., 124 S.W.2d 399; Tucker v. Higdon, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 973, and authorities there cited; Texas & N. O. Ry. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The case is one of fact which the trial judge resolved against appellant, upon-what is deemed sufficient evidence. No good purpose can be served by filing a written opinion, and under the now settled rule none will be filed. Page v. Hart, Tex.Civ.App., 124 S.W.2d 399; Tucker v. Higdon, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 973, and authorities there cited; Texas & N. O. Ry. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.W.2d 1014, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-j-moore-v-clyde-eckols-texapp-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack