M. J. Moore v. Clyde Eckols
149 S.W.2d 1014, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 218
Opinion
The case is one of fact which the trial judge resolved against appellant, upon-what is deemed sufficient evidence. No good purpose can be served by filing a written opinion, and under the now settled rule none will be filed. Page v. Hart, Tex.Civ.App., 124 S.W.2d 399; Tucker v. Higdon, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 973, and authorities there cited; Texas & N. O. Ry. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M. J. Moore v. Clyde Eckols, 149 S.W.2d 1014, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 218 (Tex. Ct. App. 1941).
149 S.W.2d 1014 (M. J. Moore v. Clyde Eckols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. Mireles
155 S.W.2d 840 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Western Life Ins. Co. v. Alcorn
153 S.W.2d 868 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)