M. J. Kelly Co. v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

M. J. Kelly Co. v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal

54 A.D.2d 582, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13938

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 582 (M. J. Kelly Co. v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M. J. Kelly Co. v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal, 54 A.D.2d 582, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13938 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action inter alia to declare that plaintiff has a license to cross defendant’s tracks, defendant appeals from a resettled judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 17, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, (1) declared that defendant had granted plaintiff a license to cross its tracks at a particular point, which license may not be revoked at this time, (2) declared that plaintiff had established an easement by prescription to cross defendant’s land at another point for itself, its suppliers and its customers to make use of plaintiff’s loading bays in its building and (3) enjoined defendant’s erection of a barrier to bar plaintiff’s use of said easement. Resettled judgment affirmed, with costs, on [583]*583the opinion of Mr. Justice Rubin at Special Term. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia to declare that plaintiff has a license to cross defendant’s tracks, defendant appeals from a resettled judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 17, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, (1) declared that defendant had granted plaintiff a license to cross its tracks at a particular point, which license may not be revoked at this time, (2) declared that plaintiff had established an easement by prescription to cross defendant’s land at another point for itself, its suppliers and its customers to make use of plaintiff’s loading bays in its building and (3) enjoined defendant’s erection of a barrier to bar plaintiff’s use of said easement. Resettled judgment affirmed, with costs, on [583]*583the opinion of Mr. Justice Rubin at Special Term. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 582, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-j-kelly-co-v-brooklyn-eastern-district-terminal-nyappdiv-1976.