M. H. Wagner v. United States

Fourth Circuit

M. H. Wagner v. United States

220 F.2d 513, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3387

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 11, 1955

Docket6928

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 220 F.2d 513 (M. H. Wagner v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M. H. Wagner v. United States, 220 F.2d 513, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3387 (4th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in a criminal case in which appellant failed to file with the Clerk of the District Court written notice of appeal within ten days, as required by Rule 37 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. As strict compliance with this requirement of the rule is jurisdictional, we have no option but to dismiss the appeal. Appellant is not hurt by the dismissal, however, as we have examined the record on appeal and find that the points on which he relies are without merit.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in a criminal case in which appellant failed to file with the Clerk of the District Court written notice of appeal within ten days, as required by Rule 37 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. As strict compliance with this requirement of the rule is jurisdictional, we have no option but to dismiss the appeal. Appellant is not hurt by the dismissal, however, as we have examined the record on appeal and find that the points on which he relies are without merit.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 F.2d 513, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-h-wagner-v-united-states-ca4-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack