M. Goble & Co. v. Mills

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

M. Goble & Co. v. Mills

1913 OK 23, 129 P. 706, 36 Okla. 516, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 902

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 7, 1913

Docket2465

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK 23 (M. Goble & Co. v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M. Goble & Co. v. Mills, 1913 OK 23, 129 P. 706, 36 Okla. 516, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 902 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

SEIARP, C.

The petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed in this court on March 27, 1911. The case was duly assigned for hearing at the December, 1912, term, and, being reached in due course on the calendar, it appears that no briefs have been filed as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). It follows that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

SEIARP, C.

The petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed in this court on March 27, 1911. The case was duly assigned for hearing at the December, 1912, term, and, being reached in due course on the calendar, it appears that no briefs have been filed as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). It follows that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK 23, 129 P. 706, 36 Okla. 516, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-goble-co-v-mills-okla-1913.