M. Goble & Co. v. Mills

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

M. Goble & Co. v. Mills

1913 OK 23, 129 P. 706, 36 Okla. 516, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 902

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 7, 1913·No. 2465·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

SEIARP, C.

The petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed in this court on March 27, 1911. The case was duly assigned for hearing at the December, 1912, term, and, being reached in due course on the calendar, it appears that no briefs have been filed as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). It follows that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

SEIARP, C.

The petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed in this court on March 27, 1911. The case was duly assigned for hearing at the December, 1912, term, and, being reached in due course on the calendar, it appears that no briefs have been filed as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). It follows that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

M. Goble & Co. v. Mills, 1913 OK 23, 129 P. 706, 36 Okla. 516, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 902 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

1913 OK 23 (M. Goble & Co. v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.