M. Farris & Co. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 620
United States Customs Court·Decided March 22, 1960·No. Reap. Dec. 9643; Entry Nos. 701032; 701033·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a re-appraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff and the cases were ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

The submission for decision of any ease shall be made in open court by the-parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request tO' the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a ease does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the? [621]*621issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I liave examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M. Farris & Co. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 620 (cusc 1960).

44 Cust. Ct. 620 (M. Farris & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.