M. E. Dey & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

M. E. Dey & Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 371

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1956

DocketNo. 59761; protest 165064-K (Milwaukee)

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 371 (M. E. Dey & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M. E. Dey & Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 371 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cane furniture similar in all material respects to that the subject of Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475), the chairs in question were held dutiable at 20 percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified by T. D. 51802, for chairs, wholly or in chief value of wood, and furniture, other than chairs, was held dutiable at 12}i percent under said modified paragraph,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cane furniture similar in all material respects to that the subject of Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475), the chairs in question were held dutiable at 20 percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified by T. D. 51802, for chairs, wholly or in chief value of wood, and furniture, other than chairs, was held dutiable at 12}i percent under said modified paragraph,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Cust. Ct. 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-e-dey-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.