M. E. Dey & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

M. E. Dey & Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 371

United States Customs Court·Decided March 15, 1956·No. No. 59761; protest 165064-K (Milwaukee)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cane furniture similar in all material respects to that the subject of Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475), the chairs in question were held dutiable at 20 percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified by T. D. 51802, for chairs, wholly or in chief value of wood, and furniture, other than chairs, was held dutiable at 12}i percent under said modified paragraph,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cane furniture similar in all material respects to that the subject of Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475), the chairs in question were held dutiable at 20 percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified by T. D. 51802, for chairs, wholly or in chief value of wood, and furniture, other than chairs, was held dutiable at 12}i percent under said modified paragraph,

M. E. Dey & Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 371 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

36 Cust. Ct. 371 (M. E. Dey & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.