M. Doob & Bro. v. Lovell Manufacturing Co.
12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 722
This text of 12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 722 (M. Doob & Bro. v. Lovell Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
M. Doob & Bro. v. Lovell Manufacturing Co., 12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 722 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1898).
Opinion
Judgment oí court of common pleas affirmed without report. For opinion in the court below, which was by Judge Hollister, see 4 Dec. 189 (3 N. P. 169), the holding being that two brothers, named. Doob, doing business as M. Doob & Brother, must register under the statute relating to the use of fictitious names in partnerships.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-doob-bro-v-lovell-manufacturing-co-ohiocirct-1898.