M. C. Kiser Co. v. Pope

88 So. 197, 18 Ala. App. 54, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 44
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 8, 1921·No. 6 Div. 715.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

[1] This ease was tried by the judge without the intervention of a jury, and hence every presumption will be indulged in favor of his finding.

[2] The mere failure of a party, filling out a printed form at the instance of the representative of a wholesale merchant!, from whom he is obtaining credit for the purchase of merchandise, to fill out one of the blanks' at the end of one or more of the questions in the blank form, does not necessarily and of itself constitute a representation, upon which there can be based an action for fraud and-deceit.

We have examined the record in this case, and after allowing all necessary presumptions in favor of the judgment of the trial court, we cannot say that the conclusions reached are error.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M. C. Kiser Co. v. Pope, 88 So. 197, 18 Ala. App. 54, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 44 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

88 So. 197 (M. C. Kiser Co. v. Pope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J. R. Raible Co. v. City Bank & Trust Co.
112 So. 543 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1927)
Milner v. J.H. Lewis Son
104 So. 444 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)