M B Steel Corp. v. United Steel Warehouse Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

M B Steel Corp. v. United Steel Warehouse Corp.

29 A.D.2d 560, 286 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2692

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 560 (M B Steel Corp. v. United Steel Warehouse Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M B Steel Corp. v. United Steel Warehouse Corp., 29 A.D.2d 560, 286 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 24, 1967, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Judgment of said court dated December 23, 1966 and made after a nonjury trial modified, on the law and .the facts, by increasing the principal amount awarded to plaintiff from $10,554.43 to $11,582.03 and by increasing the interest and the total accordingly. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, under the proof adduced at the trial, defendant was not entitled to any portion of its alleged setoff of $4,174. Apart from this, according to the trial court’s view of the case the principal amount of the judgment should have been $10,654.43, but because of arithmetical error the award given therefor was $100 less. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 24, 1967, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Judgment of said court dated December 23, 1966 and made after a nonjury trial modified, on the law and .the facts, by increasing the principal amount awarded to plaintiff from $10,554.43 to $11,582.03 and by increasing the interest and the total accordingly. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, under the proof adduced at the trial, defendant was not entitled to any portion of its alleged setoff of $4,174. Apart from this, according to the trial court’s view of the case the principal amount of the judgment should have been $10,654.43, but because of arithmetical error the award given therefor was $100 less. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 560, 286 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-b-steel-corp-v-united-steel-warehouse-corp-nyappdiv-1967.