M. B. I. Export & Import, Ltd. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

M. B. I. Export & Import, Ltd. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 406

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in M. B. I. Export & Import, Ltd. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 363 →

United States Customs Court·Decided January 3, 1958·No. No. 61431; protests 277127-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of machine tools; that they are multipurpose machine vises and spare parts therefor; and that said multipurpose machine vises are not hand tools and are composed wholly of metal and used exclusively to hold metal material, which is to be worked upon by a power-driven tool, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of machine tools; that they are multipurpose machine vises and spare parts therefor; and that said multipurpose machine vises are not hand tools and are composed wholly of metal and used exclusively to hold metal material, which is to be worked upon by a power-driven tool, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

M. B. I. Export & Import, Ltd. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 406 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

40 Cust. Ct. 406 (M. B. I. Export & Import, Ltd. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.