M. Adler's Son, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 411
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in M. Adler's Son, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Cust. Ct. 466 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 29, 1960·No. No. 64039; protest 58/721 (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise identified as article Nos. 53047, 53048-9-50, 51596, and 53341 consists of figures in chief value of decorated porcelain ware and does not contain 25 percent or more of calcined bone, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said articles.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M. Adler's Son, Inc. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 411 (cusc 1960).
44 Cust. Ct. 411 (M. Adler's Son, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.