M. A. Payne Enterprises v. H & M Distributing
This text of 428 A.2d 667 (M. A. Payne Enterprises v. H & M Distributing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order striking an appeal from an arbitration award for failure to file sufficient recognizance. Its disposition is controlled by Hamilton, t/d/b/a Hamilton Maintenance v. Harida and Harida, and Woodlawn Builders, Inc., 280 Pa.Super. 45, 421 A.2d 396 (1980).
The order of the lower court is reversed and appellant’s appeal from the arbitration award is reinstated, with leave to appellee to file such exceptions to the bail filed by appellant as appellee may believe appropriate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
428 A.2d 667, 287 Pa. Super. 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-a-payne-enterprises-v-h-m-distributing-pasuperct-1980.