M. A. Payne Enterprises v. H & M Distributing

428 A.2d 667, 287 Pa. Super. 619
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 18, 1980·No. No. 401·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

This is an appeal from an order striking an appeal from an arbitration award for failure to file sufficient recognizance. Its disposition is controlled by Hamilton, t/d/b/a Hamilton Maintenance v. Harida and Harida, and Woodlawn Builders, Inc., 280 Pa.Super. 45, 421 A.2d 396 (1980).

The order of the lower court is reversed and appellant’s appeal from the arbitration award is reinstated, with leave to appellee to file such exceptions to the bail filed by appellant as appellee may believe appropriate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M. A. Payne Enterprises v. H & M Distributing, 428 A.2d 667, 287 Pa. Super. 619 (Pa. Ct. App. 1980).

428 A.2d 667 (M. A. Payne Enterprises v. H & M Distributing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fox v. Gabler
31 Pa. D. & C.3d 452 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1983)