M. A. Mead & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

M. A. Mead & Co. v. United States

27 Cust. Ct. 309, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1018

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 5, 1951

DocketNo. 55847; protest 122836-K/692 (Chicago)

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Cust. Ct. 309 (M. A. Mead & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M. A. Mead & Co. v. United States, 27 Cust. Ct. 309, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1018 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise in question consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of United States v. Helbros Watch Co. et al. (38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the merchandise was held properly dutiable at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise in question consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of United States v. Helbros Watch Co. et al. (38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the merchandise was held properly dutiable at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, supra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Cust. Ct. 309, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-a-mead-co-v-united-states-cusc-1951.