Lytle's Executors v. Reed

Ohio Supreme Court

Lytle's Executors v. Reed

1 Wright 248, 1 Ohio Ch. 248

DecidedApril 15, 1833

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 248 (Lytle's Executors v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lytle's Executors v. Reed, 1 Wright 248, 1 Ohio Ch. 248 (Ohio 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

The only question is, can tho complainants, whose testator purchased this mortgaged property, subsequent to the mortgage, be let in to redeem, as against the defendants, who purchased at a judicial sale, under the mortgage? The case of Dennison v. * Allen, 4 O. 495, decides this precise question [249 for the defendants. Interests acquired from the mortgagor, subsequently to that of the mortgage on which the scire facias issued, and the sale was made, are concluded by the sale.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT.

The only question is, can tho complainants, whose testator purchased this mortgaged property, subsequent to the mortgage, be let in to redeem, as against the defendants, who purchased at a judicial sale, under the mortgage? The case of Dennison v. * Allen, 4 O. 495, decides this precise question [249 for the defendants. Interests acquired from the mortgagor, subsequently to that of the mortgage on which the scire facias issued, and the sale was made, are concluded by the sale.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wright 248, 1 Ohio Ch. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lytles-executors-v-reed-ohio-1833.