Lytle v. Whicher

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Lytle v. Whicher

21 La. Ann. 182

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 15, 1869

DocketNo. 430

StatusPublished

This text of 21 La. Ann. 182 (Lytle v. Whicher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lytle v. Whicher, 21 La. Ann. 182 (La. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Howe, J.

It appears hy the record in this case that the note sued on was given in part payment for certain slaves. In accordance, therefore, with the decisions of our predecessors, which have become the settled jurisprudence of the State, the judgment from which the defendants have appealed must he set aside.

Wainwright v. Bridge, 19 An. 234; Austin v. Sandel, 19 An. 309; Halley v. Hoeffner, 19 An. 519.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from he avoided and reversed, and that there he judgment in favor of defendants with costs in hoth courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howe, J.

It appears hy the record in this case that the note sued on was given in part payment for certain slaves. In accordance, therefore, with the decisions of our predecessors, which have become the settled jurisprudence of the State, the judgment from which the defendants have appealed must he set aside.

Wainwright v. Bridge, 19 An. 234; Austin v. Sandel, 19 An. 309; Halley v. Hoeffner, 19 An. 519.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from he avoided and reversed, and that there he judgment in favor of defendants with costs in hoth courts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 La. Ann. 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lytle-v-whicher-la-1869.