Lytle v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Lytle v. Roberts

1915 OK 582, 151 P. 191, 50 Okla. 565, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 462

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 3, 1915

Docket4957

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1915 OK 582 (Lytle v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lytle v. Roberts, 1915 OK 582, 151 P. 191, 50 Okla. 565, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 462 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

DUDLEY, C.

This is an appeal from the district court of Logan county. There was judgment for defendants in error, from which plaintiff in error has properly perfected an appeal to this court. He has served and filed a brief in compliance with the rules of this court. Defendants in error have neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for their failure to do so. We have examined the record, and the brief appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, and under the numerous authorities of this court, it is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment may be sustained, but may reverse the judgment in accordance with the prayer of the petition of plaintiff in error. Phillips v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 99, 118 Pac. 371.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

DUDLEY, C.

This is an appeal from the district court of Logan county. There was judgment for defendants in error, from which plaintiff in error has properly perfected an appeal to this court. He has served and filed a brief in compliance with the rules of this court. Defendants in error have neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for their failure to do so. We have examined the record, and the brief appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, and under the numerous authorities of this court, it is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment may be sustained, but may reverse the judgment in accordance with the prayer of the petition of plaintiff in error. Phillips v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 99, 118 Pac. 371.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK 582, 151 P. 191, 50 Okla. 565, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lytle-v-roberts-okla-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack