Lytle v. Prescott

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Lytle v. Prescott

58 N.W. 688, 57 Minn. 129, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 238

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 20, 1894

DocketNo. 8658

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 58 N.W. 688 (Lytle v. Prescott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lytle v. Prescott, 58 N.W. 688, 57 Minn. 129, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 238 (Mich. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilfillan, C. J.

Of the three assignments of error the first and third are bad under the rules, — the first, because it does not show whether it is taken to the court’s findings of fact or its conclusion of law, and, if to the findings of fact, it does not show to which of them (there being several); the third, because it assigns as error the denial of the motion for a new trial, without specifying to which of the several points made by the motion the assignment applies. There is no merit in the second assignment of error. There was evidence to sustain the finding referred to in it. Order affirmed.

Buck, J., absent, sick, took no part.

(Opinion published 58 N. W. 688.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilfillan, C. J.

Of the three assignments of error the first and third are bad under the rules, — the first, because it does not show whether it is taken to the court’s findings of fact or its conclusion of law, and, if to the findings of fact, it does not show to which of them (there being several); the third, because it assigns as error the denial of the motion for a new trial, without specifying to which of the several points made by the motion the assignment applies. There is no merit in the second assignment of error. There was evidence to sustain the finding referred to in it. Order affirmed.

Buck, J., absent, sick, took no part.

(Opinion published 58 N. W. 688.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.W. 688, 57 Minn. 129, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lytle-v-prescott-minn-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack