Lytle v. Hancock County

91 S.E. 219, 19 Ga. App. 193, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 58
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 23, 1917·No. 7725·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. The negligence of a chauffeur, in failing to avoid danger while driving his master in an automobile, is imputable to the master. Read v. City &c. Railway Co., 115 Ga. 366 (41 S. E. 629).

2. The great preponderance of the evidence was to the effect that the county bridge, on which the plaintiff’s automobile was being driven at the time of the injury sued for, was in a reasonably safe condition, and that her injuries were caused solely by the negligence of her employee and chauffeur, in driving the automobile at a reckless and high rate of speed upon and over the bridge, which, like all other such bridges, slightly sagged in the middle; and that the same chauffeur had often driven over this bridge and was well acquainted with its condition at the time of the injury. The evidence as a whole strongly authorized the verdict returned' for the defendant.

3 There were slight errors in the two excerpts from the charge of the court excepted to, but, under the facts of the case, they were harmless and do not require a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lytle v. Hancock County, 91 S.E. 219, 19 Ga. App. 193, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 58 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

91 S.E. 219 (Lytle v. Hancock County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hightower v. Landrum
136 S.E.2d 425 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Morris v. Cochran
106 S.E.2d 836 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Hatcher v. Seitz
75 S.E.2d 273 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)