Lytle v. City of St. Louis

365 S.W.3d 254, 2012 WL 944530, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 375
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 20, 2012
DocketED 97210
StatusPublished

This text of 365 S.W.3d 254 (Lytle v. City of St. Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lytle v. City of St. Louis, 365 S.W.3d 254, 2012 WL 944530, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 375 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Melicia Lytle appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and incorporating the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) in the Division of Workers’ Compensation denying compensation. The Commission’s decision was supported by competent and substantial evidence in the record.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 S.W.3d 254, 2012 WL 944530, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lytle-v-city-of-st-louis-moctapp-2012.