Lytle v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lytle v. City of St. Louis

365 S.W.3d 254, 2012 WL 944530, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 375

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 2012·No. ED 97210·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Melicia Lytle appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and incorporating the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) in the Division of Workers’ Compensation denying compensation. The Commission’s decision was supported by competent and substantial evidence in the record.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Melicia Lytle appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and incorporating the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) in the Division of Workers’ Compensation denying compensation. The Commission’s decision was supported by competent and substantial evidence in the record.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Lytle v. City of St. Louis, 365 S.W.3d 254, 2012 WL 944530, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 375 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

365 S.W.3d 254 (Lytle v. City of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.