Lytle (Termaine) Vs. State
This text of Lytle (Termaine) Vs. State (Lytle (Termaine) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
TERMAINE ANTHONY LYTLE, No. 79443 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. SEP 1 6 2019 EL BROWN CL RENE COURT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY MMTYCLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a "motion for order of delivery of records at state expense." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this comt ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
bAka-A ,J Hardesty
A'aiauf) , J. Stiglich Silver
cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Termaine Anthony Lytle Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
Eta.-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lytle (Termaine) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lytle-termaine-vs-state-nev-2019.