Lysecki v. Lysecki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lysecki v. Lysecki

249 A.D. 672, 291 N.Y.S. 197, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5468

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 11, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 672 (Lysecki v. Lysecki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lysecki v. Lysecki, 249 A.D. 672, 291 N.Y.S. 197, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court, Broome county, entered on the report of an official referee. The judgment directs the two defendant banks to pay to plaintiff one-half of each of two deposits standing in the respective banks in the name of the defendant Martha Lysecki. Plaintiff and defendant Martha are husband and wife. Plaintiff showed that the moneys m these two bank accounts were the savings from his own wages over a long period of years and that there was an agreement between them when these moneys were deposited that they should belong to both of them, each owning a one-half interest in them. Defendant served an amended answer containing a counterclaim which answer was returned. Judgment modified by striking therefrom the portion which dismisses the counterclaims, and as so modified affirmed, with costs. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court, Broome county, entered on the report of an official referee. The judgment directs the two defendant banks to pay to plaintiff one-half of each of two deposits standing in the respective banks in the name of the defendant Martha Lysecki. Plaintiff and defendant Martha are husband and wife. Plaintiff showed that the moneys m these two bank accounts were the savings from his own wages over a long period of years and that there was an agreement between them when these moneys were deposited that they should belong to both of them, each owning a one-half interest in them. Defendant served an amended answer containing a counterclaim which answer was returned. Judgment modified by striking therefrom the portion which dismisses the counterclaims, and as so modified affirmed, with costs. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 672, 291 N.Y.S. 197, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lysecki-v-lysecki-nyappdiv-1936.