Lyons v. Williams
This text of Lyons v. Williams (Lyons v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA DAVON LYONS, Case No. 2:19-cv-00966-APG-NJK 4 Petitioner, Order Granting Motion for Leave to File Exhibit Under Seal v. [ECF No. 79] WARDEN BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., 7 Respondents. 8 9 Before the Court is the Petitioner’s motion for leave to file document under seal. ECF No. 79. The Petitioner seek leave to file one document under seal: his Presentence Investigation Report (“PSI”), dated December 30, 2014. ECF No. 78. Under Nevada law, the PSI is “confidential and must not be made a part of any public record.” NRS § 176.156(5). Having 13}|reviewed and considered the matter in accordance with Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), and its progeny, I find that a compelling need to 15}| protect the Petitioner’s safety, privacy, and/or personal identifying information outweighs the 16}| public interest in open access to court records. 17 I] THEREFORE ORDER that the motion to seal (ECF No. 79) is granted. Exhibit 24 (ECF No. 78) is considered properly filed under seal. 19 Dated: September 15, 2022 20 CZ ANDREW P. GORDON 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lyons v. Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyons-v-williams-nvd-2022.