Lyons v. Ward

124 Mass. 364, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 323
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided April 6, 1878·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The denial, at the beginning of the answer, of each and every allegation in the declaration, put in issue all the facts necessary to be proved by the plaintiff to make out a primé facie case. Davis v. Travis, 98 Mass. 222. The plaintiff, for evidence in support of that issue, relied on the statements in subsequent clauses of the answer, setting up distinct defences; and cited Jackson v. Stetson, 15 Mass. 48, as establishing the rule that, when two pleas were pleaded, admissions in the one might be given in evidence on the trial of the other. But since that decision it has been enacted by the Legislature that statements in the pleadings should not be evidence on the trial. Rev. Sts. c. 100, § 18, and Commissioners’ Report, § 17 and note. Gen. Sts. c. 129, § 72. Walcott v. Kimball, 13 Allen, 460. As the plaintiff offered no other evidence, judgment was rightly ordered for the defendant. Objections to the inponsisteacy of defences in the answer, as to the misjoinder of counts in the declaration, can only be taken by demurrer. Gen. Sts. c. 129, §§ 12, 16, 24. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lyons v. Ward, 124 Mass. 364, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 323 (Mass. 1878).

124 Mass. 364 (Lyons v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Finley v. Mattson
59 Mass. App. Dec. 112 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1976)
Herman v. Fine
49 N.E.2d 597 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1943)
Wolff v. Perkins
254 Mass. 10 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1925)
Sargent v. Stetson
63 N.E. 929 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
Day v. Crosby
53 N.E. 880 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Manners v. City of Haverhill
135 Mass. 165 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)
Blackington v. Johnson
126 Mass. 21 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1878)