Lyons v. Third Avenue Railroad

7 Rob. 605
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 15, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 Rob. 605 (Lyons v. Third Avenue Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lyons v. Third Avenue Railroad, 7 Rob. 605 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1867).

Opinion

Jones, J.

The modification is asked for on two grounds, 1st. The defendant is only seeking for delay. 2d. That the plaintiff's health is very precarious, and if he should die before judgment entered, the action would abate.

The first ground was not seriously pressed, and indeed cannot be maintained. The second ground is covered by ■that portion of section 121 of the Code, which provides:

4‘After a verdict shall be rendered in any action for a wrong, such action shall not abate by the death of any party/’ &e.

This action was brought to recover damages for injuries [606]*606sustained by the plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant’s servants in starting one of their cars while the plaintiff was in the act of getting off'.

The section above referred to covers this cause of • action,'and of course it is unnecessary for the protection of the plaintiff that judgment should be entered; while, on the other hand, under, the practice of this court, if judgment is entered, it will be a bar to the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Motion denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saper v. Delgado
146 F.2d 714 (Second Circuit, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Rob. 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyons-v-third-avenue-railroad-nysuperctnyc-1867.