Lyons v. State

2021 ND 91, 959 N.W.2d 882
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedMay 20, 2021
Docket20200333
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 ND 91 (Lyons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lyons v. State, 2021 ND 91, 959 N.W.2d 882 (N.D. 2021).

Opinion

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MAY 20, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2021 ND 91

George Robert Lyons, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20200333

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable John A. Thelen, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for petitioner and appellant.

Rachel R. Egstad, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellee. Lyons v. State No. 20200333

[¶1] George Robert Lyons appeals from an order denying his amended application for post-conviction relief. Following a jury trial, Lyons was convicted of gross sexual imposition. Lyons applied for post-conviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, arguing his attorney’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness because counsel decided not to impeach the victim about a prior, unrelated report of sexual assault. Following a hearing, the district court found the attorney’s decision was reasonable trial strategy. The court further found the attorney discussed his trial strategy with Lyons, who accepted or at least trusted his attorney’s decision, and concluded Lyons failed to meet his burden to prove his attorney’s assistance was ineffective.

[¶2] We conclude the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. The evidence supports the court’s findings on trial strategy and the attorney’s communication of trial strategy with Lyons. See Noorlun v. State, 2007 ND 118, ¶¶ 12-14, 736 N.W.2d 477 (stating we do not second guess trial tactics on appeal, including strategic decisions about how to question certain witnesses). The court did not err in denying Lyons’ application for post-conviction relief, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).

[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lyons v. State
2024 ND 19 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 ND 91, 959 N.W.2d 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyons-v-state-nd-2021.