Lyons v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lyons v. State

771 So. 2d 1286, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15442, 2000 WL 1745066

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 29, 2000

DocketNo. 4D99-3070

StatusPublished

This text of 771 So. 2d 1286 (Lyons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lyons v. State, 771 So. 2d 1286, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15442, 2000 WL 1745066 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After being resentenced pursuant to our opinion in Lyons v. State, 730 So.2d 833 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), appellant filed a motion to correct the new sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). The motion requested that the trial court vacate a portion of the sentence which violated double jeopardy and also sought additional relief. At the hearing, which took place without the appellant being present, the court granted some, but not all of the relief sought by appellant. We agree with appellant that his presence was required. State v. Scott, 439 So.2d 219 (Fla.1983)(defendant must be present at hearing on motion to correct illegal split sentence held pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850). We therefore reverse and remand for another resentencing hearing.

KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After being resentenced pursuant to our opinion in Lyons v. State, 730 So.2d 833 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), appellant filed a motion to correct the new sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). The motion requested that the trial court vacate a portion of the sentence which violated double jeopardy and also sought additional relief. At the hearing, which took place without the appellant being present, the court granted some, but not all of the relief sought by appellant. We agree with appellant that his presence was required. State v. Scott, 439 So.2d 219 (Fla.1983)(defendant must be present at hearing on motion to correct illegal split sentence held pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850). We therefore reverse and remand for another resentencing hearing.

KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

771 So. 2d 1286, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15442, 2000 WL 1745066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyons-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack