Lyons v. Pirello

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Lyons v. Pirello

196 So. 2d 276, 250 La. 462, 1967 La. LEXIS 2707

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 27, 1967·No. No. 48603·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re: Joseph C. Lyons applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of [463] Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 194 So.2d 147.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.

FOURNET, C. J.,

is of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to the penalties and attorneys’ fees claimed under the facts of the case as found to be by the Court of Appeal, and, therefore a writ should be granted in this case.

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion that the writ should be granted for the reason there was no bona fide cause under the facts for the employer to question the hazardous nature of the employment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Joseph C. Lyons applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of [463] Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 194 So.2d 147.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.

FOURNET, C. J.,

is of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to the penalties and attorneys’ fees claimed under the facts of the case as found to be by the Court of Appeal, and, therefore a writ should be granted in this case.

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion that the writ should be granted for the reason there was no bona fide cause under the facts for the employer to question the hazardous nature of the employment.

Lyons v. Pirello, 196 So. 2d 276, 250 La. 462, 1967 La. LEXIS 2707 (La. 1967).

Pincite

196 So. 2d 276 (Lyons v. Pirello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related