Lyons v. North Shore University Hospital at Plainview

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lyons v. North Shore University Hospital at Plainview

279 A.D.2d 458, 719 N.Y.S.2d 580, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 175

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 8, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D.2d 458 (Lyons v. North Shore University Hospital at Plainview) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lyons v. North Shore University Hospital at Plainview, 279 A.D.2d 458, 719 N.Y.S.2d 580, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 175 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated November 23, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

[459]*459The materials submitted by the appellant in support of its motion for summary judgment were sufficient to establish, prima facie, entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. These materials included deposition testimony from hospital employees and from the plaintiff and his brother, establishing that they did not know how the plaintiff sustained his injuries, and were not aware of any negligence on the defendant’s part. Consequently, the complaint is based upon pure speculation (see, Barland v Cryder House, 203 AD2d 405; Morales v Kiamesha Concord, 43 AD2d 944, affd 35 NY2d 881). The plaintiffs contentions fail to raise a triable issue of fact that the defendant’s negligence caused his injuries. Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, CPLR 3212). Altman, J. P., Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated November 23, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

[459]*459The materials submitted by the appellant in support of its motion for summary judgment were sufficient to establish, prima facie, entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. These materials included deposition testimony from hospital employees and from the plaintiff and his brother, establishing that they did not know how the plaintiff sustained his injuries, and were not aware of any negligence on the defendant’s part. Consequently, the complaint is based upon pure speculation (see, Barland v Cryder House, 203 AD2d 405; Morales v Kiamesha Concord, 43 AD2d 944, affd 35 NY2d 881). The plaintiffs contentions fail to raise a triable issue of fact that the defendant’s negligence caused his injuries. Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, CPLR 3212). Altman, J. P., Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 458, 719 N.Y.S.2d 580, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyons-v-north-shore-university-hospital-at-plainview-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack