Lyons v. Merchants National Bank
168 N.E. 926, 91 Ind. App. 703, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 410
Opinion
Appellee herein has failed to file any brief, and appellants have petitioned the court for oral argument.
Upon examination of appellant’s brief, we find that the only error assigned is that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. Appellant’s brief does not contain the motion, nor does it present any other question for our consideration.
The request for oral argument is denied.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lyons v. Merchants National Bank, 168 N.E. 926, 91 Ind. App. 703, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 410 (Ind. Ct. App. 1929).
168 N.E. 926 (Lyons v. Merchants National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.