Lyons v. Hammond Elevator Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Lyons v. Hammond Elevator Co.

132 Ill. App. 617, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 188

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 13, 1907

DocketGen. No. 4,773

StatusPublished

This text of 132 Ill. App. 617 (Lyons v. Hammond Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lyons v. Hammond Elevator Co., 132 Ill. App. 617, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 188 (Ill. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Willis

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit in assumpsit brought in the Circuit Court of Livingston county by plaintiff in error against defendant in error and W. B. Lundy, terminating there in a verdict and judgment against Lundy, and in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in error.

Plaintiff sued out a writ of error, but has not brought Lundy into this court, and does not name bim as one of the parties to this suit in his assignment of errors. We have not, therefore, all the parties to this record and judgment before us. If we permitted this case to proceed to judgment, at the next term or at any time within the limitation of a writ of error, Lundy might sue out another writ of error here, omitting the Hammond Elevator Company as a party, and this court would be required to review and pass on the same record twice. Such is not the practice. Upon a writ of error, the record in this court must agree with the record below. A writ of error is a new suit, and all the plaintiffs or all the defendants in the original case who are alive must be joined in the writ of error, and it is competent for one to'join the others without their consent. The reason for the rule is apparent: ■If one defendant or plaintiff can prosecute a writ of error, each of his co-defendants or co-plaintiffs may do likewise, and as many writs might be sued out as there were plaintiffs or defendants. Fraser v. Fraser, 110 Ill. App. 619, and cases there cited.

Lundy must be brought into this court by either procuring his entry of appearance, or by scire facias, to hear the errors assigned. Until all the parties are before us, we shall not have jurisdiction to determine the correctness of the proceedings 'below.

The order taking the cause for hearing is vacated.

Vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Willis

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit in assumpsit brought in the Circuit Court of Livingston county by plaintiff in error against defendant in error and W. B. Lundy, terminating there in a verdict and judgment against Lundy, and in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in error.

Plaintiff sued out a writ of error, but has not brought Lundy into this court, and does not name bim as one of the parties to this suit in his assignment of errors. We have not, therefore, all the parties to this record and judgment before us. If we permitted this case to proceed to judgment, at the next term or at any time within the limitation of a writ of error, Lundy might sue out another writ of error here, omitting the Hammond Elevator Company as a party, and this court would be required to review and pass on the same record twice. Such is not the practice. Upon a writ of error, the record in this court must agree with the record below. A writ of error is a new suit, and all the plaintiffs or all the defendants in the original case who are alive must be joined in the writ of error, and it is competent for one to'join the others without their consent. The reason for the rule is apparent: ■If one defendant or plaintiff can prosecute a writ of error, each of his co-defendants or co-plaintiffs may do likewise, and as many writs might be sued out as there were plaintiffs or defendants. Fraser v. Fraser, 110 Ill. App. 619, and cases there cited.

Lundy must be brought into this court by either procuring his entry of appearance, or by scire facias, to hear the errors assigned. Until all the parties are before us, we shall not have jurisdiction to determine the correctness of the proceedings 'below.

The order taking the cause for hearing is vacated.

Vacated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 Ill. App. 617, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyons-v-hammond-elevator-co-illappct-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack