Lyons v. Fox New England Theatres, Inc.

153 A. 778, 112 Conn. 691
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 5, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 153 A. 778 (Lyons v. Fox New England Theatres, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lyons v. Fox New England Theatres, Inc., 153 A. 778, 112 Conn. 691 (Colo. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The death of the deceased resulted from coronary occlusion. The night before in bed at his home he had suffered severe pain. On the day he died, before going to his work upon the stage of a theatre where he was employed, he visited a physician who diagnosed the condition from which he had been suffering as angina pectoris. He was engaged prior to his death in work about the stage, in shifting scenery and helping to move a heavy movietone machine. After his work was finished for the afternoon he walked about, talked with his wife and the manager of the theatre and apparently suffered no ill effects from his work. About fifteen or twenty minutes after stopping work he died suddenly. The finding of the commissioner was that the heart condition from which the deceased was suffering was not aggravated by his work *692 and that his death was not the result of an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. It was incumbent upon the claimant to prove it to have been at least a reasonable probability that the death of the deceased arose out of his employment. Dombrowski v. Jennings & Griffin Co., 103 Conn. 720, 729, 131 Atl. 745; Madore v. New Departure Mfg. Co., 104 Conn. 709, 714, 134 Atl. 259. Two of the medical expert witnesses stated that in their judgment this could not be said to be so; the most they could say was that it was reasonably possible. In this condition of the evidence the finding of the commissioner was one which he might reasonably have made and it must stand. The' corrections sought either would be insufficient to affect the result or are negatived by the facts he has properly found,

There is no . error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDonough v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.
527 A.2d 664 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1987)
Waskiewicz v. Egan, Administrator
15 Conn. Super. Ct. 286 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1947)
Bergagna v. Department of Labor & Industries
91 P.2d 551 (Washington Supreme Court, 1939)
Heirs of Parilla v. Industrial Commission
52 P.R. 427 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1937)
Sucesión de París Parrilla v. Comisión Industrial de Puerto Rico
52 P.R. Dec. 441 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 A. 778, 112 Conn. 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyons-v-fox-new-england-theatres-inc-conn-1931.