Lyons v. Feldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lyons v. Feldman

56 A.D.2d 923, 392 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11317

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 923 (Lyons v. Feldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lyons v. Feldman, 56 A.D.2d 923, 392 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11317 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mortgage, defendant Jerome Feldman appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 9, 1976, as, inter alia, (1) denied his motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to join necessary parties defendant and (2) vacated a prior stay of the entry of plaintiff’s interlocutory judgment of foreclosure and sale. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. On the basis of the record presented, no additional defendants are required, and the stay was properly vacated. Upon the argument of the appeal before us, respondent stipulated that it would not interpose the defense of the Statute of Limitations to the severed counterclaims of the defendants. Hargett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mortgage, defendant Jerome Feldman appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 9, 1976, as, inter alia, (1) denied his motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to join necessary parties defendant and (2) vacated a prior stay of the entry of plaintiff’s interlocutory judgment of foreclosure and sale. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. On the basis of the record presented, no additional defendants are required, and the stay was properly vacated. Upon the argument of the appeal before us, respondent stipulated that it would not interpose the defense of the Statute of Limitations to the severed counterclaims of the defendants. Hargett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 923, 392 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyons-v-feldman-nyappdiv-1977.