Lyons v. Cates Consulting Analysts, Inc.
This text of 478 N.E.2d 206 (Lyons v. Cates Consulting Analysts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as deals with the question as to whether the defense and counterclaim defeat plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (88 AD2d 526). In view of defendant’s concession that the instrument sued on is one for money only within the meaning of CPLR 3213, we do not pass on that issue.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
478 N.E.2d 206, 64 N.Y.2d 1025, 489 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyons-v-cates-consulting-analysts-inc-ny-1985.