Lyons v. Cates Consulting Analysts, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Lyons v. Cates Consulting Analysts, Inc.

478 N.E.2d 206, 64 N.Y.2d 1025, 489 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16940

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 2, 1985·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as deals with the question as to whether the defense and counterclaim defeat plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (88 AD2d 526). In view of defendant’s concession that the instrument sued on is one for money only within the meaning of CPLR 3213, we do not pass on that issue.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as deals with the question as to whether the defense and counterclaim defeat plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (88 AD2d 526). In view of defendant’s concession that the instrument sued on is one for money only within the meaning of CPLR 3213, we do not pass on that issue.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.

Lyons v. Cates Consulting Analysts, Inc., 478 N.E.2d 206, 64 N.Y.2d 1025, 489 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16940 (N.Y. 1985).

Pincite

478 N.E.2d 206 (Lyons v. Cates Consulting Analysts, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related