Lyon v. Sherman

14 Abb. Pr. 393
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1862
StatusPublished

This text of 14 Abb. Pr. 393 (Lyon v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lyon v. Sherman, 14 Abb. Pr. 393 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1862).

Opinion

Barnard, J.

According to the cases of Claflin a. Sanger (11 Abbotts' Pr., 338; S. C. at Chambers, 31 Barb., 36), Moody, a. Townsend (3 Abbotts’ Pr., 375), and Davis a. Morris (21 Barb., 152), all decided by the Supreme Court of this district, the confessions of judgment in these actions are insufficient. But, I think, the cases of Freligh a. Brink

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freligh v. . Brink
22 N.Y. 418 (New York Court of Appeals, 1860)
Freligh v. Brink
30 Barb. 144 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)
Claflin v. Sanger
31 Barb. 36 (New York Supreme Court, 1859)
Freligh v. Brink
18 How. Pr. 89 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Abb. Pr. 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyon-v-sherman-nysupct-1862.