Lyon v. Sherman
This text of 14 Abb. Pr. 393 (Lyon v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
According to the cases of Claflin a. Sanger (11 Abbotts' Pr., 338; S. C. at Chambers, 31 Barb., 36), Moody, a. Townsend (3 Abbotts’ Pr., 375), and Davis a. Morris (21 Barb., 152), all decided by the Supreme Court of this district, the confessions of judgment in these actions are insufficient. But, I think, the cases of Freligh a. Brink
The principle in the above two cited cases in the Court of Appeals will sustain the judgments in these actions.
Motion denied, with $10 costs.
The case of Freligh a. Brink, 22 N. Y., 418, reverses S. C., 30 Barb., 144, and 16 How. Pr., 272 ; and affirms S. C., 18 How. Pr., 89.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Abb. Pr. 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyon-v-sherman-nysupct-1862.