Lyon v. Scott

C.D. California

Lyon v. Scott

432 F. Supp. 108, 40 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5055, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15871

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California

DecidedMay 16, 1977

DocketNo. CV 77-0896-AAH

StatusPublished

This text of 432 F. Supp. 108 (Lyon v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lyon v. Scott, 432 F. Supp. 108, 40 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5055, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15871 (C.D. Cal. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

HAUK, District Judge.

FINDING OF FACT

1. Defendants Martin F. Klotz and Alan R. Herson, in dealing with the plaintiff Robert W. Lyon and handling plain[109]*109tiff’s petition to the United States Tax Court on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service, at all times acted within the scope of their employment and carried out their official duties in good faith.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. None of the counts contained in plaintiff’s complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted.

2. Judges are absolutely immune from civil liability for acts done by them within their judicial jurisdiction. Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 554, 87 S.Ct. 1213, 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967); Harvey v. Sadler, 331 F.2d 387 (9th Cir. 1964).

3. This suit is barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Although officers and agents of the United States government were named as defendants herein, the relief sought would be obtained against the sovereign itself and would interfere with the administration of public law. There is no statute which, in a proceeding such as the present, waives the sovereign immunity of the United States, and consequently this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction of this case. Hawaii v. Gordon, 373 U.S. 57, 83 S.Ct. 1052, 10 L.Ed.2d 191 (1963); United States v. Alabama, 313 U.S. 274, 61 S.Ct. 1011, 85 L.Ed. 1327 (1941); United States v. Shaw, 309 U.S. 495, 60 S.Ct. 659, 84 L.Ed. 888 (1940).

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAUK, District Judge.

FINDING OF FACT

1. Defendants Martin F. Klotz and Alan R. Herson, in dealing with the plaintiff Robert W. Lyon and handling plain[109]*109tiff’s petition to the United States Tax Court on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service, at all times acted within the scope of their employment and carried out their official duties in good faith.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. None of the counts contained in plaintiff’s complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted.

2. Judges are absolutely immune from civil liability for acts done by them within their judicial jurisdiction. Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 554, 87 S.Ct. 1213, 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967); Harvey v. Sadler, 331 F.2d 387 (9th Cir. 1964).

3. This suit is barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Although officers and agents of the United States government were named as defendants herein, the relief sought would be obtained against the sovereign itself and would interfere with the administration of public law. There is no statute which, in a proceeding such as the present, waives the sovereign immunity of the United States, and consequently this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction of this case. Hawaii v. Gordon, 373 U.S. 57, 83 S.Ct. 1052, 10 L.Ed.2d 191 (1963); United States v. Alabama, 313 U.S. 274, 61 S.Ct. 1011, 85 L.Ed. 1327 (1941); United States v. Shaw, 309 U.S. 495, 60 S.Ct. 659, 84 L.Ed. 888 (1940).

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

432 F. Supp. 108, 40 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5055, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyon-v-scott-cacd-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack