Lyon v. Perry

14 Ind. 515
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 13, 1860·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit to foreclose a mortgage. The mortgaged premises had been purchased by another of the mortgagor, and the purchaser was made a party defendant with the mortgagor.

The complaint did not allege that the mortgage had been recorded, nor that the purchaser bought with notice. But these facts were proved without objection on the trial, and the Court found, therefore, that the mortgage was valid against the purchaser.

It was objected on the trial that the original mortgage, instead of the recorded copy, should be introduced to prove the contents of the mortgage, but there was no objection to the giving in of the record to show the fact of the mortgage being recorded, and, hence, notice to the purchaser.

The record is made by statute original evidence of the contents of the mortgage. 2 R. S. p. 92.

Under these circumstances, we think it appears to us that the case has been fairly decided on its merits, and that the judgment must be affirmed. 2 R. S. pp. 123,162, §§ 382, 580.

A Steele and II. D. Thompson, for the appellants. H. S. Kelley and R. T. St. John, for the appellees.

The judgment is affirmed with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lyon v. Perry, 14 Ind. 515 (Ind. 1860).

14 Ind. 515 (Lyon v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Embree v. Emerson
74 N.E. 44 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1905)
Carver v. Carver
97 Ind. 497 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Skillen v. Jones
44 Ind. 136 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)
Bowers v. Van Winkle
41 Ind. 432 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)
Whitney v. Lehmer
26 Ind. 503 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1866)
Winship v. Clendenning
24 Ind. 439 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1865)