Lyon v. . McMillan

72 N.C. 392
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1875·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*393 Settle, J.

A judgment obtained at a regular term of the Court was set aside by his Honor at Chambers, on motion of the defendant. No notice of such motion having been given to the plaintiff. See Sutton v. McMillan, at this term.

There is error. Let this be certified.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lyon v. . McMillan, 72 N.C. 392 (N.C. 1875).

72 N.C. 392 (Lyon v. . McMillan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andreen v. Andreen
115 P. 761 (California Court of Appeal, 1911)
Harrison v. . Hargrove
26 S.E. 936 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
Fisher v. CID Copper Mining Co.
10 S.E. 1055 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)