Lyon v. Insurance Co.
6 Dakota 67
Opinion
The judgment of the lower court is affirmed upon the ground that Webb & Nichols were such agents of the defendant as to have the power to waive the matter of incumbrances, which were known to them at the time of negotiating and accepting the risk for the company, irrespective of the Florida statute offered in evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lyon v. Insurance Co., 6 Dakota 67 (dakotasup 1888).
6 Dakota 67 (Lyon v. Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Prose v. Hawkeye Securities Fire Insurance
211 N.W. 970 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1927)
Queen Insurance v. Patterson Drug Co.
73 Fla. 665 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1917)
Berglund v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail Insurance
142 N.W. 941 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1913)
Thomas v. Modern Brotherhood of America
127 N.W. 572 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1910)
Leisen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
127 N.W. 837 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1910)
Fosmark v. Equitable Fire Ass'n
120 N.W. 777 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1909)
Smith v. Mutual Cash Guaranty Fire Ins.
113 N.W. 94 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1907)
Vesey v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.
101 N.W. 1074 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1904)
Harding v. Norwich Union Fire Ins Society
71 N.W. 755 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1897)
South Bend Toy Manuf'g Co. v. Dakota Fire & Marine Ins.
52 N.W. 866 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1892)