Lyon v. City of Cambridge

136 Mass. 419, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 125
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 30, 1884·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

C. Allen, J.

It was necessary for the plaintiff, within thirty days after receiving his injury, to give written notice to the defendant of the cause thereof. Pub. Sts. c. 52, § 19. This was a condition precedent to his right of recovery. Shea v. Lowell, 132 Mass. 187. The alleged defect relied on as the cause of the plaintiff’s injury was a depression in the sidewalk, caused by the intersection of a passageway, which depression he was unable to see by reason of the darkness. But the darkness and the omission to light the street did not constitute a defect in the way for which the defendant is liable under the statute. Macomber v. Taunton, 100 Mass. 255. Nor is the defendant under any greater liability by reason of the city ordinance. Lorillard v. Monroe, 1 Kernan, 392, 396. Bowie v. Alexandria, 3 Pet. 398, 409. 2 Dillon Mun. Corp. (3d ed.) § 950. In the notice, no mention was made of the depression, which alone constituted the supposed defect. The Legislature having prescribed this condition, and the plaintiff having failed to comply with it, we can do no otherwise than hold that he is not entitled to maintain his action.

Exceptions overruled■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lyon v. City of Cambridge, 136 Mass. 419, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 125 (Mass. 1884).

136 Mass. 419 (Lyon v. City of Cambridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pecorelli v. City of Worcester
30 N.E.2d 230 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Cameron v. City of Somerville
285 Mass. 307 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Harris v. City of Genoa
195 N.W. 953 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1923)
Hill v. City of Boston
121 N.E. 24 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1918)
Goodwin v. City of Fall River
117 N.E. 796 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1917)
Blain v. Incorporated Town of Montezuma
129 N.W. 808 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1911)
Aiken v. City of Columbus
78 N.E. 657 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1906)
Dickinson v. City of Boston
75 N.E. 68 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Spillane v. City of Fitchburg
58 N.E. 176 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Hubbell v. City of Viroqua
30 N.W. 847 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1886)