Lyon v. Brooks
2 Edw. Ch. 110
Opinion
said: If there were any rule of equity pleading, by which a defendant is precluded from availing himself of matters arising between the filing of the bill and the answer, by way of avoidance or defence, there might be some ground for these exceptions. But there is not; and it certainly cannot be said that the matters set up are foreign to the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lyon v. Brooks, 2 Edw. Ch. 110 (N.Y. 1833).
2 Edw. Ch. 110 (Lyon v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Norris v. United Mineral Products Co.
158 P.2d 679 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1945)
Wormser v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
76 N.E. 1036 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)
Wormser v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
98 A.D. 29 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
U. S. Life Insurance v. Gage
26 Abb. N. Cas. 16 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Wilson v. Patrick
34 Iowa 362 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1872)
Carpenter v. Bell
19 Abb. Pr. 258 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1863)